The core types in the Gjallarhorn library implement IObservable<'a>
, which will make the implementation look familiar (remember the EventStream
property from the FSharp.ViewModule example). The only real change to our model is the order of the arguments of the update function. Also, we now use the term Message instead of Event.
namespace ScoreLogic.Model
type Score = { ScoreA: int ; ScoreB: int }
type ScoreMessage = IncA | DecA | IncB | DecB | NewGame
// Module showing allowed operations
[<CompilationRepresentation(CompilationRepresentationFlags.ModuleSuffix)>]
module Score =
let zero = {ScoreA = 0; ScoreB = 0}
let update msg score =
match msg with
| IncA -> {score with ScoreA = score.ScoreA + 1}
| DecA -> {score with ScoreA = max (score.ScoreA - 1) 0}
| IncB -> {score with ScoreB = score.ScoreB + 1}
| DecB -> {score with ScoreB = max (score.ScoreB - 1) 0}
| NewGame -> zero
In order to build a UI with Gjallarhorn, instead of making classes to support data binding, we create simple functions referred to as a Component
. In their constructor the first argument source
is of type BindingSource
(defined in Gjallarhorn.Bindable), and used to map the model to the view, and events from the view back into messages.
namespace ScoreLogic.Model
open Gjallarhorn
open Gjallarhorn.Bindable
module Program =
// Create binding for entire application.
let scoreComponent source (model : ISignal<Score>) =
// Bind the score to the view
model |> Binding.toView source "Score"
[
// Create commands that turn into ScoreMessages
source |> Binding.createMessage "NewGame" NewGame
source |> Binding.createMessage "IncA" IncA
source |> Binding.createMessage "DecA" DecA
source |> Binding.createMessage "IncB" IncB
source |> Binding.createMessage "DecB" DecB
]
The current implementation differs from the FSharp.ViewModule version in that two commands do not have CanExecute properly implemented yet. Also listing the application’s plumbing.
namespace ScoreLogic.Model
open Gjallarhorn
open Gjallarhorn.Bindable
module Program =
// Create binding for entire application.
let scoreComponent source (model : ISignal<Score>) =
let aScored = Mutable.create false
let bScored = Mutable.create false
// Bind the score itself to the view
model |> Binding.toView source "Score"
// Subscribe to changes of the score
model |> Signal.Subscription.create
(fun currentValue ->
aScored.Value <- currentValue.ScoreA > 0
bScored.Value <- currentValue.ScoreB > 0)
|> ignore
[
// Create commands that turn into ScoreMessages
source |> Binding.createMessage "NewGame" NewGame
source |> Binding.createMessage "IncA" IncA
source |> Binding.createMessageChecked "DecA" aScored DecA
source |> Binding.createMessage "IncB" IncB
source |> Binding.createMessageChecked "DecB" bScored DecB
]
let application =
// Create our score, wrapped in a mutable with an atomic update function
let score = new AsyncMutable<_>(Score.zero)
// Create our 3 functions for the application framework
// Start with the function to create our model (as an ISignal<'a>)
let createModel () : ISignal<_> = score :> _
// Create a function that updates our state given a message
// Note that we're just taking the message, passing it directly to our model's update function,
// then using that to update our core "Mutable" type.
let update (msg : ScoreMessage) : unit = Score.update msg |> score.Update |> ignore
// An init function that occurs once everything's created, but before it starts
let init () : unit = ()
// Start our application
Framework.application createModel init update scoreComponent
Left with setting up the decoupled view, combining the MainWindow
type and the logical application.
namespace ScoreBoard.Views
open System
open FsXaml
open ScoreLogic.Model
// Create our Window
type MainWindow = XAML<"MainWindow.xaml">
module Main =
[<STAThread>]
[<EntryPoint>]
let main _ =
// Run using the WPF wrappers around the basic application framework
Gjallarhorn.Wpf.Framework.runApplication System.Windows.Application MainWindow Program.application
This sums up the core concepts, for additional information and a more elaborate example please refer to Reed Copsey’s post. The Christmas Trees project highlights a couple of benefits to this approach: