Microbenchmark is useful for estimating the time taking for otherwise fast procedures. For example, consider estimating the time taken to print hello world.
system.time(print("hello world"))
# [1] "hello world"
# user system elapsed
# 0 0 0
This is because system.time
is essentially a wrapper function for proc.time
, which measures in seconds. As printing "hello world" takes less than a second it appears that the time taken is less than a second, however this is not true. To see this we can use the package microbenchmark:
library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(print("hello world"))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# print("hello world") 26.336 29.984 44.11637 44.6835 45.415 158.824 100
Here we can see after running print("hello world")
100 times, the average time taken was in fact 44 microseconds. (Note that running this code will print "hello world" 100 times onto the console.)
We can compare this against an equivalent procedure, cat("hello world\n")
, to see if it is faster than print("hello world")
:
microbenchmark(cat("hello world\n"))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# cat("hello world\\n") 14.093 17.6975 23.73829 19.319 20.996 119.382 100
In this case cat()
is almost twice as fast as print()
.
Alternatively one can compare two procedures within the same microbenchmark
call:
microbenchmark(print("hello world"), cat("hello world\n"))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval
# print("hello world") 29.122 31.654 39.64255 34.5275 38.852 192.779 100
# cat("hello world\\n") 9.381 12.356 13.83820 12.9930 13.715 52.564 100